DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD21667739·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 5 months agoOFF CALENDAR. Moot. Requested relief granted per February 24, 2026 order.

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT, LLC VS. GEORGE GARRIGUS ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Entry Of Stipulation Of Parties To Vacate Default Judgment Entered On November 25, 2024

Hearing date
Mar 13, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffEQUITY RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT, LLC
DefendantGEORGE GARRIGUS

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD21667739 - March 13, 2026 Hearing date: March 13, 2026 Case number: CUD21667739 Case title: EQUITY RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT, LLC VS. GEORGE GARRIGUS ET AL Case Number: | | CUD21667739 | Case Title: | | EQUITY RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT, LLC VS. GEORGE GARRIGUS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-13 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Entry Of Stipulation Of Parties To Vacate Default Judgment Entered On November 25, 2024 | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 13, 2026. Line 12.

PLAINTIFF EQUITY RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT, LLC Motion For Entry Of Stipulation Of Parties To Vacate Default Judgment Entered On November 25, 2024; is OFF CALENDAR. Moot. Requested relief granted per February 24, 2026 order. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share