Motion for Reconsideration
25CV023298: NORDSTROM, INC. vs EMER 07/27/2026 Hearing on Motion for Reconsideration in Department 8C
Tentative Ruling
NOTICE:
Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure:
To request limited oral argument, on any matter on this calendar, you must call the Department 8C Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-8380 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice mail message: a) identifying themselves as the party requesting oral argument; b) indicating the specific matter/motion for which they are requesting oral argument; and c) confirming that it has notified the opposing party of its intention to appear and that opposing party may appear via Zoom using the Zoom link and Meeting ID indicated below. If no request for oral argument is made, the tentative ruling becomes the final order of the Court.
Unless ordered to appear in person by the Court, parties may appear remotely either telephonically or by video conference via the Zoom video/audio conference platform with notice to the Court and all other parties in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure §367.75. Although remote participation is not required, the Court will presume all parties are appearing remotely for non-evidentiary civil hearings.
Any hearing on this matter will be held by the Hon. Thadd A. Blizzard in Department 11B of the Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye Courthouse located at 500 G Street Sacramento, CA. The Zoom Link for Department 11B is https://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/16090961628 and the Zoom Meeting ID is 160 9096 1628. To appear on Zoom telephonically, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the Zoom Meeting ID referenced above. NO COURTCALL APPEARANCES WILL BE ACCEPTED.
Although any hearing on this matter will be held in Department 11B, you must call the Department 8C Oral Argument Request Line provided above to request argument.
Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private court reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government code §68086 and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
25CV023298: NORDSTROM, INC. vs EMER 07/27/2026 Hearing on Motion for Reconsideration in Department 8C
A Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) is required to be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to the hearing, if not using a reporter from the Courts Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list.
Once the form is signed it must be filed with the clerk. If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and it must be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will forward the form to the Court Reporters Office and an official reporter will be provided.
TENTATIVE RULING
***NOTICE: THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD IN DEPARTMENT 11B OF THE TANI G. CANTIL-SAKAUYE COURTHOUSE LOCATED AT 500 G STREET SACRAMENTO, CA. PARTIES APPEARING REMOTELY VIA ZOOM SHOULD ENSURE THAT THEY ARE USING THE CORRECT ZOOM LINK AND/OR ZOOM MEETING ID FOR DEPARTMENT 11B, WHICH ARE PROVIDED ABOVE.***
Due to Judge Miadichs unavailability on the noticed hearing date, this matter is CONTINUED to August 5, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 8C.
No further briefing is permitted.
On the Court's own motion, the Hearing on Motion for Reconsideration scheduled for 07/27/2026 is continued to 08/05/2026 at 01:30 PM in Department 8C at Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye Courthouse.