DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CPF25519453·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 5 months agoCONTINUED

IN RE: NICOLAS SOMMER

Notice Of Hearing On Petition To Compel Mediation And For Related Attorneys Fees

Hearing date
Mar 11, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Apr 10, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerNICOLAS SOMMER

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CPF25519453 - March 11, 2026 Hearing date: March 11, 2026 Case number: CPF25519453 Case title: IN RE: NICOLAS SOMMER Case Number: | | CPF25519453 | Case Title: | | IN RE: NICOLAS SOMMER | Court Date: | | 2026-03-11 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Hearing On Petition To Compel Mediation And For Related Attorneys Fees | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 11, 2026. Line 1.

PETITIONER NICOLAS SOMMER Notice Of Hearing On Petition To Compel Mediation And For Related Attorneys Fees is continued to April 10, 2026 for the moving party to file a supplemental brief citing authorities re: petition to compel mediation under CCP 1281.2. Brief shall not cite any authorities regarding petitions and motions to compel arbitration. Brief shall be limited to two pages. If no authorities are located, the brief shall state "none." =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share