DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25679468·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 6 months agoDENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

1532 HARRISON LENDER LLC VS. AUSTIN QUERUBIN ET AL

Motion For Entry Of Judgment For Monetary Damges Pursuant To Stipulation

Hearing date
Mar 6, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff1532 HARRISON LENDER LLC
DefendantAUSTIN QUERUBIN

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679468 - March 6, 2026 Hearing date: March 6, 2026 Case number: CUD25679468 Case title: 1532 HARRISON LENDER LLC VS. AUSTIN QUERUBIN ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679468 | Case Title: | | 1532 HARRISON LENDER LLC VS. AUSTIN QUERUBIN ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-06 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Entry Of Judgment For Monetary Damges Pursuant To Stipulation | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 6, 2026. Line 7.

PLAINTIFF 1532 HARRISON LENDER LLC Motion For Entry Of Judgment For Monetary Damges Pursuant To Stipulation. is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. No competent evidence of breach provided. Additionally, no evidence, argument or authority provided to support the demand for the entire amount due under paragraph 3B at this time. The Court also notes that the declaration of Balai Melatti does not include any exhibits. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share