DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25680092·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 6 months agoOFF CALENDAR. Stipulation for Entry of Judgment on file.

SIC-MCM 750 O'FARRELL STREET, LP VS. DAROYA MCALISTER ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / Notice Of Motion & Motion For Summary Judgment

Hearing date
Mar 2, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSIC-MCM 750 O'FARRELL STREET, LP
DefendantDAROYA MCALISTER

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680092 - March 2, 2026 Hearing date: March 2, 2026 Case number: CUD25680092 Case title: SIC-MCM 750 O'FARRELL STREET, LP VS. DAROYA MCALISTER ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680092 | Case Title: | | SIC-MCM 750 O'FARRELL STREET, LP VS. DAROYA MCALISTER ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-02 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / Notice Of Motion & Motion For Summary Judgment | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 2, 2026. Line 10. DEFENDANT DAROYA MCALISTER MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / Notice Of Motion & Motion For Summary Judgment OFF CALENDAR. Stipulation for Entry of Judgment on file. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share