DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25680352·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 6 months agoGRANTED

JOSE KIRCHNER ET AL VS. JAHANSHAH YADEGAR ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Relief From Default And Default Judgment

Hearing date
Feb 27, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffJOSE KIRCHNER
DefendantJAHANSHAH YADEGAR

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 27, 2026. Line 15. DEFENDANT JAHANSHAH YADEGAR's Motion For Relief From Default And Default Judgment: Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Default is GRANTED. The Court notes that it appears from the reply declaration that possession is no longer at issue. Should Plaintiff desire to convert this action to a regular civil action for breach of contract by filing an amended complaint, Defendant shall properly and timely respond to such amended complaint. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share