DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25680733·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 6 months agoCONTINUED

BRICK & TIMBER, INC. VS. LAUREN MELTON ET AL

Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery; Motion to Deem Admissions Admitted; Motion for Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Feb 25, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Mar 4, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBRICK & TIMBER, INC.
DefendantLAUREN MELTON

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680733 - February 25, 2026 Hearing date: February 25, 2026 Case number: CUD25680733 Case title: BRICK & TIMBER, INC. VS. LAUREN MELTON ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680733 | Case Title: | | BRICK & TIMBER, INC. VS. LAUREN MELTON ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-25 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion Of Plaintiff To: 1) Compel Responses By Defendant To Form Interrogatories-Unlawful Detainer (Set One) Without Objection; Compel Responses By Defendant To Form Interrogatories-General (Set One); Compel Responses By Defendant To Special Interrogatories (Set One) Without Objection; Compel Responses By Defendant To Request For Production Of Documents (Set One) Without Objection; 2) Deem Admitted By Defendant Requests For Admission (Set One), And For Monetary Sanctions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 25, 2026.

Line 16. PLAINTIFF BRICK & TIMBER, INC. Motion Of Plaintiff To: 1) Compel Responses By Defendant To Form Interrogatories-Unlawful Detainer (Set One) Without Objection; Compel Responses By Defendant To Form Interrogatories-General (Set One); Compel Responses By Defendant To Special Interrogatories (Set One) Without Objection; Compel Responses By Defendant To Request For Production Of Documents (Set One) Without Objection; 2) Deem Admitted By Defendant Requests For Admission (Set One), And For Monetary Sanctions; is continued to March 4, 2026 for the moving party to file a supplemental declaration explaining how the discovery was served on January 15, 2026 by Patrick Woo (See Ex.

F to Tong Declaration at page 1, line 27) having been "caused" to be served by counsel who prepared the discovery a day later, on January 16, 2026 (See Tong Declaration, paragraph 2).

Supplemental declaration to be filed and served no later than February 25, 2026 by 5:00 p.m. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share