Motion To Vacate And Rescind The Settlement Agreement
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678874 - February 20, 2026 Hearing date: February 20, 2026 Case number: CUD25678874 Case title: 594 VALENCIA LLC VS. SERGIO ISAIAS FLORIAN PINEDA ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678874 | Case Title: | | 594 VALENCIA LLC VS. SERGIO ISAIAS FLORIAN PINEDA ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-20 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion; Motion To Vacate And Rescind The Settlement Agreement | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 20, 2026. Line 7. DEFENDANT SERGIO ISAIAS FLORIAN PINEDA, AN INDIVIDUAL, JOSSELIN ARACELY COYADO CHACON Motion To Vacate And Rescind The Settlement Agreement is DENIED.
While the Court understands that doubling Defendants' monthly payment obligation is unwise, the Court cannot find that the Stipulation was the result of undue influence, reasonable mistake, or excusable neglect. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.
A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”