Status Conference
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION 05/01/2026, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002578 Petitioner: Trelawny-Barrett, Alice Attorney: Montgomery, D. Laurence Self-Represented Respondent: Berry, Jacob Peter Erik Attorney: Self-Represented
1. This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
2. The Court notes that the following are still required: a. FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed. b. FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. c. Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following: i. FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR ii.
Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. OR iii. FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure.
3. The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”