| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion For Extension Of Time To Apply For Default Judgment
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24615290 - February 10, 2026 Hearing date: February 10, 2026 Case number: CGC24615290 Case title: ADAM FAGEL ET AL VS. OYVIND SEAN KINSEY ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24615290 | Case Title: | | ADAM FAGEL ET AL VS. OYVIND SEAN KINSEY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-10 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion For Extension Of Time To Apply For Default Judgment | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 10, 2026. Line 4. PLAINTIFF ADAM FAGEL, AN INDIVIDUAL, ELLEN CLEARY Motion For Extension Of Time To Apply For Default Judgment is DENIED as unnecessary and premature.
This matter is set for trial. As a general rule there can be only one final judgment in a single action. See Nicholson v. Henderson (1944) 25 Cal.2d 375. In this case, the application for and entry of judgment is appropriate upon the complete resolution of the matter between all parties. Therefore, given the procedural posture of the case no extension is needed at this time. =(501/REQ)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”