Vaughn vs. American Woodmark Corporation

regard to the existence of any private agreement to arbitrate.”]; Garrido v. Air Liquide Indus. U.S. LP (2015) 241 Cal. App. 4th 833, 844–45 [“The FAA preempts Labor Code section 229, requiring enforcement of an arbitration agreement covering [actions for the collection of due and unpaid wages].”].)

Both the Federal Arbitration Act and California law provide for a stay of proceedings pending arbitration. (9 U.S.C. §3; CCP §1281.4.) As such, the court stays the action pending completion of arbitration.

The court sets an ADR review hearing for April 8, 2027 at 9:00 a.m.

Defendants are ordered to give notice of this ruling.

11 30-2025-01513896 Off Calendar Vaughn vs. American Woodmark Corporation, a Virginia corporation 12 30-2022-01240591 MOTION 1: Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Responses Boucher vs. to RFP, Set One, from UA POC Unstoppable Automotive Group, Plaintiff Louis Baird Boucher’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Compel LLC Further Responses to Requests for Production of Documents (“RFP”), Set One from Defendant Unstoppable Automotive POC, LLC (“UA POC”) is GRANTED IN PART as to RFP Nos. 1-6 and DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART as to RFP Nos. 7-9. IT IS ORDERED THAT within thirty (30) days of this ruling, UA POC shall provide to Plaintiff complete, code- compliant further responses to Plaintiff’s RFP Nos. 1-6 (as modified in the ruling below), provide a privilege log to Plaintiff for any documents withheld on the basis of privilege, and produce all non-privileged, responsive documents to Plaintiff.

The court OVERRULES UA POC’s objections to Plaintiffs’ counsel, Hali M. Anderson’s declaration.

The subject discovery concerns Plaintiff’s wage and hour law violation claims underlying the single PAGA cause of action asserted against Defendants in this action. Plaintiff seeks documents related to his own employment records, and all documents related to UA POC’s compensation plans, employee handbooks and HR manuals, timekeeping, compensation and