DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC18571386·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 6 months agoDENIED

CHARLES LI VS. MEI LING FANG ET AL

Motion To To Set Aside Default Entered On Jun-07-2019

Hearing date
Feb 6, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCHARLES LI
DefendantMEI LING FANG
DefendantVI TRAN AKA DAN V. TRAN

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC18571386 - February 6, 2026 Hearing date: February 6, 2026 Case number: CGC18571386 Case title: CHARLES LI VS. MEI LING FANG ET AL Case Number: | | CGC18571386 | Case Title: | | CHARLES LI VS. MEI LING FANG ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-06 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To To Set Aside Default Entered On Jun-07-2019 | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 6, 2026. Line 1.

DEFENDANT VI TRAN AKA DAN V. TRAN AN INDIVIDUAL Motion To To Set Aside Default Entered On Jun-07-2019 is DENIED. No authority is cited by the moving party warranting the relief requested. =(501/REQ) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share