DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26680898·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 7 months agoCONTINUED

IVAN KWOK HUNG LEUNG ET AL VS. JIMMY LITTLE ET AL

DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Feb 4, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Feb 9, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffIVAN KWOK HUNG LEUNG
DefendantJIMMY LITTLE

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26680898 - February 4, 2026 Hearing date: February 4, 2026 Case number: CUD26680898 Case title: IVAN KWOK HUNG LEUNG ET AL VS. JIMMY LITTLE ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26680898 | Case Title: | | IVAN KWOK HUNG LEUNG ET AL VS. JIMMY LITTLE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-04 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 4, 2026 line 7. DEFENDANTS' DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT is continued to February 9, 2026 per the order of the presiding judge. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252].

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share