DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25680557·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 7 months agoOVERRULED, 5 days to answer from notice of entry of order.

KAY TSENIN VS. MADELINE PFEIFFER ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Feb 2, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffKAY TSENIN
DefendantMADELINE PFEIFFER

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680557 - February 2, 2026 Hearing date: February 2, 2026 Case number: CUD25680557 Case title: KAY TSENIN VS. MADELINE PFEIFFER ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680557 | Case Title: | | KAY TSENIN VS. MADELINE PFEIFFER ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-02 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 2, 2026. Line 7. DEFENDANT MADELINE PFEIFFER DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT; is OVERRULED, 5 days to answer from notice of entry of order.

The Complaint states a cause of action and is not uncertain. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share