DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25679461·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 7 months agoOFF CALENDAR

MARILOU D. SAMSON VS. NANCY SELIM

Notice Of Motion And Motion (Combined Motion - Set Aside Mandatory Settlement, Continuance, And Service Requirements)

Hearing date
Jan 23, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMARILOU D. SAMSON
DefendantNANCY SELIM

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679461 - January 23, 2026 Hearing date: January 23, 2026 Case number: CUD25679461 Case title: MARILOU D. SAMSON VS. NANCY SELIM Case Number: | | CUD25679461 | Case Title: | | MARILOU D. SAMSON VS. NANCY SELIM | Court Date: | | 2026-01-23 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion (Combined Motion - Set Aside Mandatory Settlement, Continuance, And Service Requirements) | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 23, 2026. Line 11.

PLAINTIFF MARILOU SAMSON Motion (Combined Motion - Set Aside Mandatory Settlement, Continuance, And Service Requirements) is OFF CALENDAR. Proof of service does not indicate the moving papers were served by any method. None of the boxes under "Method of service" are checked. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share