| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion And Motion For Award Of Attorney'S Fees And Costs
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25623660 - January 23, 2026 Hearing date: January 23, 2026 Case number: CGC25623660 Case title: BOAZ MARILES VS. BLANCA S MARILES ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25623660 | Case Title: | | BOAZ MARILES VS. BLANCA S MARILES ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-23 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Award Of Attorney'S Fees And Costs | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 23, 2026. Line 7.
PLAINTIFF BOAZ MARILES Motion For Award Of Attorney'S Fees And Costs is GRANTED.
Cross-Defendant's Anti-Slapp motion was meritorious. Cross-Complaint was dismissed before the hearing on the Anti-Slapp motion. The Anti-Slapp motion was timely filed and promptly re-noticed upon the tentative ruling issued by department 302 for a hearing in department 501. CCP 128.5 and Zarate v. McDaniel (2023) 97 Cal.App.5th 484 have no applicability to award of attorney's fees to the prevailing moving party on an Anti-Slapp motion. Attorney's fees granted in the amount of $6,300. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”