DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25623660·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 7 months agoGRANTED

BOAZ MARILES VS. BLANCA S MARILES ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Award Of Attorney'S Fees And Costs

Hearing date
Jan 23, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Attorney Fees rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$6,300

Parties

PlaintiffBOAZ MARILES
DefendantBLANCA S MARILES

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25623660 - January 23, 2026 Hearing date: January 23, 2026 Case number: CGC25623660 Case title: BOAZ MARILES VS. BLANCA S MARILES ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25623660 | Case Title: | | BOAZ MARILES VS. BLANCA S MARILES ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-23 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Award Of Attorney'S Fees And Costs | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 23, 2026. Line 7.

PLAINTIFF BOAZ MARILES Motion For Award Of Attorney'S Fees And Costs is GRANTED.

Cross-Defendant's Anti-Slapp motion was meritorious. Cross-Complaint was dismissed before the hearing on the Anti-Slapp motion. The Anti-Slapp motion was timely filed and promptly re-noticed upon the tentative ruling issued by department 302 for a hearing in department 501. CCP 128.5 and Zarate v. McDaniel (2023) 97 Cal.App.5th 484 have no applicability to award of attorney's fees to the prevailing moving party on an Anti-Slapp motion. Attorney's fees granted in the amount of $6,300. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share