DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25679291·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 7 months agoGRANTED

STEPHEN TOKUHAMA VS. DEANNE COOROUGH ET AL

MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS

Hearing date
Jan 14, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Quash rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSTEPHEN TOKUHAMA
DefendantDEANNE COOROUGH

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679291 - January 14, 2026 Hearing date: January 14, 2026 Case number: CUD25679291 Case title: STEPHEN TOKUHAMA VS. DEANNE COOROUGH ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679291 | Case Title: | | STEPHEN TOKUHAMA VS. DEANNE COOROUGH ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-14 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 14, 2026 line 11.

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS is GRANTED, subject to opposition, as follows: (1) any purported service by posting and mailing on Defendant Deanne Coorough on December 15, 2025 is quashed; (2) any other purported service by posting and mailing on Defendant Deanne Coorough, based on posting prior to January 7, 2026 is quashed; and (3) any purported personal service on Defendant Deanne Coorough prior to January 7, 2026 is quashed.

As Plaintiff has not yet filed a proof of service of summons, this order is limited and does not extend to any potential service other than those described above. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252].

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share