| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679291 - January 14, 2026 Hearing date: January 14, 2026 Case number: CUD25679291 Case title: STEPHEN TOKUHAMA VS. DEANNE COOROUGH ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679291 | Case Title: | | STEPHEN TOKUHAMA VS. DEANNE COOROUGH ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-14 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 14, 2026 line 11.
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS is GRANTED, subject to opposition, as follows: (1) any purported service by posting and mailing on Defendant Deanne Coorough on December 15, 2025 is quashed; (2) any other purported service by posting and mailing on Defendant Deanne Coorough, based on posting prior to January 7, 2026 is quashed; and (3) any purported personal service on Defendant Deanne Coorough prior to January 7, 2026 is quashed.
As Plaintiff has not yet filed a proof of service of summons, this order is limited and does not extend to any potential service other than those described above. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252].
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.
A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”