DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25627868·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 7 months agoCONTINUED

DUYEN NGUYEN VS. TRINA MUI ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jan 14, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jan 15, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDUYEN NGUYEN
DefendantTRINA MUI
DefendantTHE METROPOLITAN ASSOCIATION

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25627868 - January 14, 2026 Hearing date: January 14, 2026 Case number: CGC25627868 Case title: DUYEN NGUYEN VS. TRINA MUI ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25627868 | Case Title: | | DUYEN NGUYEN VS. TRINA MUI ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-14 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 14, 2026 line 4. DEFENDANT THE METROPOLITAN ASSOCIATION'S DEMURRER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT is continued to January 15, 2026 to be hearing with other pending motions. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252].

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share