Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record
Moving party to give notice.
3. 30-2024-01448151 1. Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record
Conley vs. Kang The unopposed motion of attorney Jessica Williams of Sweet James LLP to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff DaVon James Conley is GRANTED.
Service on the client and on all other parties who have appeared in the case was proper and all required forms containing the requisite information were filed pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.
The order will take effect once moving attorney files proof of service of the signed order (MC-053) on the client.
Moving attorney to give notice.
5. 30-2023-01313333 1. Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record 2. Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record Cortez vs. Ashey 3. Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record
The unopposed motions of attorney Donald Hartunian as counsel for Plaintiffs Mario Cortez, Maria Cortez, and Guadalupe Cortez are GRANTED.
Service on the clients and on all other parties who have appeared in the case was proper and all required forms containing the requisite information were filed pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.
The order will take effect once moving attorney files proof of service of the signed order (MC-053) on the client.
Moving attorney to give notice.
6. 30-2023-01350570 1. Motion for Leave to File Amended Cross-Complaint 2. Status Conference re: Settlement Loan Servicer LLC vs. Harmony Escrow, Defendant/cross-complainant Harmony Escrow, Inc. (“Defendant”) moves for an order granting it Inc leave to amend its Cross-Complaint and Answer to the First Amended Complaint, and deeming the proposed pleadings filed as of the date of the granting of this Motion.
“The court may, in furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper, allow a party to amend any pleading.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 473
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Here, Defendant’s proposed amendments do not add any new parties or theories of liability to this litigation. Defendant learned about the facts giving rise to the amendments in early 2025 but did not