First and Final Account and Report of Executor and Petition for its Settlement, and Petition for Final Distribution, for Allowance of Compensation to Executor and Attorney for Ordinary Services
Conservatorship of Liliana Cirigo Casas 25PR000116
REVIEW – 1ST YEAR
TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Co-Conservators are acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the matter is set for a Review – Biennial hearing in two years, on July 28, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.
Conservatorship of Rogelio Perez-Plancarte 25PR000117
REVIEW HEARING
TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Conservator is acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the matter is set for a Review – Biennial hearing in two years, on July 28, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.
Estate of Tera Scott 25PR000254
FIRST AND FINAL ACCOUNT AND REPORT OF EXECUTOR AND PETITION FOR ITS SETTLEMENT, AND PETITION FOR FINAL DISTRIBUTION, FOR ALLOWANCE OF COMPENSATION TO EXECUTOR AND ATTORNEY FOR ORDINARY SERVICES
TENTATIVE RULING: The petition is GRANTED, including fees as prayed. The November 25, 2026, Status Hearing Re: Final Distribution is VACATED.
In The Matter of Karen K. Carson Revocable Trust 26PR000040
SECOND AMENDED PETITION FOR ORDERS
TENTATIVE RULING: The matter is CONTINUED to August 4, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A.
There remains no sufficient proof of service of the Amended Petition and no proof of service of the Notice of Hearing in the Court’s file. (See Probate Code § 17203 [requiring 30 days’ notice of hearing on trust matters].) The Court notes that Petitioner filed a Proof of Service of the Amended Petition on July 13, 2026 (7/13 POS). However, the 7/13 POS does not provide proof that the Amended Petition was served on all persons listed in the Amended Petition as entitled to notice. (Compare id. with Amended Petition at 11:2.) Specifically, there is no proof of service of the Amended Petition on Ian Lowney, Colin Lowney, Maria Ramirez, Teresa 3
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”