| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Date |
|---|
Continue the guardianship
Case No. PR24-00040 Estate of Schake, Charles William
Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Counsel to update court re: states of the administration.
Case No. PR22-00021 Estate of Whalen, Robert Jack
Tentative Ruling: No Appearance Required: Absent objection, court will grant petition and sign proposed order.
Case No. PR21-00015 Guardianship of Alcaraz, Elisandra Jaurgui
Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Guardians ordered to appear.
Case No. PR21-00009 Guardianship of Ballantine, Jed
Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Guardians ordered to appear.
Case No. PR19-00024 Guardianship of Johnson, Cianna Maureen
Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Court intends to continue the guardianship upon further information from Guardians. GC-251 received, set Bi-annual review 5/08/2028.
LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – 9:30 a.m.
Case No. CV23-00203 Cohoon, Ben C. et al vs. Indian Valley Forests, LLC
Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Hearing on Motion for Leave to Amend. Court will hear argument re: timeliness of motion.
Case No. LC25-00283 Plumas County – Dept of Facilities and Airports vs. Sih, Phil
Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Motion to “Restore” is denied. Motion to enforce judgment will be partially granted. Defendant shall file a declaration in support of Attorney’s Fees request. Plaintiff may file to tax costs if so desired.
2
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.