Alvarado vs. Prime Tech Cabinets, Inc.

All counsel and self-represented parties appearing remotely must check-in online through the court’s civil video appearance website at Civil Remote Hearings | Superior Court of California | County of Orange (occourts.org) before the designated hearing time. Once the online check-in is completed, participants will be prompted to join the courtroom’s Zoom hearing session. Participants will initially be directed to a virtual waiting room pending the start of their specific video hearing. Check-in instructions and instructional video are available at Civil Remote Hearings | Superior Court of California | County of Orange (occourts.org) The Court’s “Appearance Procedures and Information--Civil Unlimited and Complex” and “Guidelines for Remote Appearances” also are available at Civil Remote Hearings | Superior Court of California | County of Orange (occourts.org) Those procedures and guidelines will be strictly enforced.

Public Access: The courtroom remains open for all evidentiary and non-evidentiary proceedings. Members of the media or public may obtain access to law and motion hearings in this department by either coming to the department at the designated hearing time or contacting the courtroom clerk at (657) 622-5618 to obtain login information. For remote appearances by the media or public, please contact the courtroom clerk 24 hours in advance so as not to interrupt the hearings.

NO FILMING, BROADCASTING, PHOTOGRAPHY, OR ELECTRONIC RECORDING IS PERMITTED OF THE VIDEO SESSION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 1.150 AND ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT RULE 180.

# Case Name Tentative

1. 2026-1552103 Alvarado vs. Demurrer is off calendar pursuant to Request for Dismissal filed as Prime Tech to Causes of Action 7 through 10. Cabinets, Inc. 3. 2023-1338703 The motion by Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants Bill Biltagi and Tropical Biltagi vs. Entertainment, Inc. (collectively, “Cross-Defendants”) for judgment Transamerica on the pleadings as to the first, fourth, and fifth causes of action Life Insurance alleged in the cross-complaint filed by Cross-Complainant Rami Company Fahil (“Fahil”) is denied.

On July 1, 2026, after hearing oral argument, the hearing on this motion was continued to allow the parties to serve and file an opposition no later than July 20, 2026, and a reply no later than July 22, 2026. (July 1, 2026, Minute Order.)

As noted in Cross-Defendant’s reply, Fahil did not timely file his opposition. However, based on Fahil’s proof of service, Fahil timely served his opposition. Cross-Defendants served and filed a timely substantive reply. The Court exercises its discretion to consider all papers filed in support of and opposition to this motion.