motion for an order admitting truth of the matters specified
Case: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Singh Case No. CV2025-1048 Hearing Date: July 29, 2026 Department Fourteen 9:00 a.m.
Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s motion for an order admitting truth of the matters specified is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280; Neal decl., ¶¶ 2-3, Exhibit A.)
The notice of motion does not provide notice of this Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 11.2(b). Counsel for moving party, or the moving party if unrepresented by counsel, is ordered to notify the opposing party or parties immediately of the tentative ruling system.
If no hearing is requested, and no party appears at the hearing, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312 or further notice is required.
3 of 5
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”