Notice Of Motion To Compel Responses To Discovery Request From Lindsey K. Tredway And For Award Of Sanctions
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678504 - July 29, 2026 Hearing date: July 29, 2026 Case number: CUD25678504 Case title: CRYSTAL R. FLORIDA VS. MICHAEL D. RAGO ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678504 | Case Title: | | CRYSTAL R. FLORIDA VS. MICHAEL D. RAGO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-29 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion To Compel Responses To Discovery Request From Lindsey K. Tredway And For Award Of Sanctions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 29, 2026. Line 8.
Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery from Tredway is GRANTED, subject to opposition. Admissions are deemed admitted. Defendant Tredway shall provide complete verified responses without objections to From Interrogatories General and Unlawful Detainer, Set One; Special Interrogatories, Set One; and Request for Production, Set One; within 5 calendar days of the Notice of Entry of Order. Sanctions granted in the amount of $660 ($300 x 2 hours + $60 fees).
This matter will be heard in department 318 by the Honorable Christopher C. Hite at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(318/CCH) Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom (Meeting ID: 160 1140 0818 Passcode: 976491).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”