Motion to Be Relieved
of service could be filed. However, there is no proof of service of this motion. As such, the court DENIES Respondent’s motion for attorney fees and costs.
3 Ahmed – Probate; 30-2023-01338597
4 Smith – Trust; 30-2023-01355718 Smith – Trust (2023-01355718) Motion to Compel
Petitioner Brian Alexander Smith’s Motion to Compel Further Response to Deposition Subpoena for Production of Business Records (Cheryl L. Barrett) (ROA 565) is DENIED.
By this motion, Petitioner seeks to compel Ferruzo & Ferruzo to produce documents in response to a subpoena, even though their custodian of records provided an affidavit stating the firm did not have the subpoenaed documents. The motion does not, however, the subject subpoena. Accordingly, the court has nothing upon which to issue an order compelling appearance and production. Further, Ferruzo & Ferruzo’s opposition is supported by a declaration from Cheryl L. Barrett attesting neither she nor she nor the firm has any documents responsive to the subpoena. Accordingly, there is nothing for the court to compel.
The court will provide notice.
5 Corona – Guardianship; 30-2024-01444318 Corona – Guardianship (2024-01444318) Motion to Be Relieved
Yerangi & Associates’s motion to be relieved as counsel for Juan Chacon and Edward Schrum (ROA 59) is GRANTED.
The court will sign the Proposed Order. Moving counsel is ORDERED to give notice to all parties to this action and file proof of service of the court’s
order as entered. Withdrawal will be effective upon filing of proof of service of the order.
6 Sebestyen – Probate; 30-2023-01368977 Notice of Withdrawal filed 06/12/2026 (ROA 136)
7 Aaron – Trust; 30-2025-01483366 Aaron – Trust (2025-01483366) Motions to Compel (3)
Petitioner Ryan Williams’ Motion to Compel Responses to Judicial Council Form Interrogatories (ROA 352), Motion for an Order Deeming as Admitted the Truth of All Matters Specified in Request for Admission, Set One (ROA 356), and Motion to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories (ROA 360) and accompanying requests for sanctions are DENIED without prejudice to being renewed if Respondent’s motion for protective order, set for hearing on 10-14-26 at 1:30 pm in Department CM07, is denied or granted only in part.
Petitioner is directed to give notice.
8 Snyder – Trust; 30-2023-01321775 Snyder – Trust (2023-01321775) Motion for Relief; Motion to Amend RFAs
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Respondent David Edwin Snyder III’s Motion for Relief from Order Deeming Requests Admitted (ROA 129) is DENIED.
Respondent David Edwin Snyder III’s Motion to Withdraw or Amend Admissions (ROA 140) is GRANTED.
Petitioner’s request for an award of fees is GRANTED in the amount of $3,150.
I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On May 7, 2025, Petitioner Janet Robin (Petitioner) served Respondent David Edwin Snyder III