Case Management Conference
24CV091150: SACHS vs KLEIN, et al. 07/28/2026 Case Management Conference in Department 19
Tentative Ruling - 07/28/2026 Joscelyn Jones
ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT
The Court has ordered the following after review of the case.
UPDATED TENTATIVE CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: JULY 17, 2026
ALL ATTORNESY ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR IN PERSON IN DEPT. 19 TO REPORT ON CASE READINESS FOR 9/18/2026 SCHEDULED JURY TRIAL AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S ORDER ON THE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR CONTINUANCE.
ALL PARTIES HAVE FILED TIMELY CMC STATEMENTS AS OF THE DATE OF THIS UPDATED TCMO.
THIS ORDER TO APPEAR IN PERSON IN DEPT. 19 OVERRIDES THE STANDING ORDER THAT PERMITS REMOTE APPEARANCE.
_____________________________________________________________________
Plaintiffs' attorneys and Defendants' attorneys are ORDERED TO APPEAR IN PERSON IN DEPT.
19.
Defendant Law Office of John Cox filed a timely CMC statement. No other party (Plaintiff or Defendant) filed a timely CMC statement in accordance with CRC 3.725. Failure to file a timely CMC statement may be a basis for the imposition of sanctions.
ALL ATTORNEYS MUST BE PREPARED TO REPORT ON CASE READINESS FOR THE 9/18/2026 SCHEDULED JURY TRIAL.
The case is currently set for PTC on 9/11/2026.
THIS ORDER TO APPEAR IN PERSON IN DEPT. 19 OVERRIDES THE STANDING ORDER THAT PERMITS REMOTE APPEARANCE.
RULES FOR CONTESTING THIS TENTATIVE ORDER If a party wishes to contest this Tentative Case Management Order, they must indicate on-line and by emails to Department 19 and all other counsel by 11 a.m. on July 28, 2026. The matter will then be set for an in-person or on-line conference at 3:00 p.m. on either July 28, 2026, or an alternate date. If no party requests such a hearing, the Tentative Order will become final. Dept19@alameda.courts.ca.gov 24CV091150: SACHS vs KLEIN, et al. 07/28/2026 Case Management Conference in Department 19
Unless ordered otherwise, remote appearances by Zoom are the default for all law & motion, case management and compliance hearings in Dept.
19. Remote appearance requires an oncamera appearance by all counsel and/or parties. Every counsel and/or party who appear remotely must have a sufficient WiFi connection for substantial visual and audio connectivity with the Court. Telephone connectivity does not constitute appearance.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
The Zoom link for remote appearance in Dept. 19 is: Join ZoomGov Meeting https://alameda-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/16079455282 Meeting ID: 160 7945 5282
Posting of this Zoom link for authorized remote appearance DOES NOT PERMIT REMOTE APPEARANCE BY ZOOM TO COUNSEL AND/OR PARTY WHO HAVE BEEN ORDERED TO APPEAR IN PERSON IN DEPT.
19.
When a MANDATORY in person court appearance is ordered, reliance on this Zoom link information will not be a justification, meritorious argument or good cause excuse for not appearing in person in Dept.
19. An entry in the eCourt Portal of a Contest to this tentative case management order DOES NOT PERMIT ANY COUNSEL TO APPEAR REMOTELY BEFORE THE COURT VIA ZOOM.
Clerk is directed to serve copies of this order, with proof of service, to counsel and to selfrepresented parties of record. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.