| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Date |
|---|
Final Report Hearing
On February 2, 2026, the court issued an Order to Show Cause why the court should not impose monetary sanctions against plaintiff’s counsel for failing to comply with the court’s February 13, 2025 order to file all supporting papers for the Final Report Hearing at least 16 days before the Final Report Hearing date. Plaintiff’s counsel failed to respond to the OSC and explain its failure to comply with the court’s February 13, 2025 order. IT IS ORDERED THAT sanctions in the amount of $250 is payable by Plaintiff’s counsel within sixty (60) days of this ruling.
The court also issues an Order to Show Cause why the court should not impose monetary sanctions against plaintiff’s counsel for failing to comply with the court’s order of February 2, 2026 to file all supporting papers for the Final Report Hearing at least 16 days before the Final Report Hearing date. The hearing is set for October 26, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. Any response to the OSC must be filed at least a week before the hearing.
Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of this ruling to Defendant.
4 30-2022-01292149 The tentative ruling is to continue the Final Report Hearing to Jimenez vs. Innovative august 10, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. to confirm that the amount of the Cleaning Services Inc. uncashed checks after the check-cashing deadline has been delivered to the cy pres recipient, East Bay Community Law Center, that the Administrator’s work is complete, and that the court’s file thus may be closed. All supporting papers must be filed at least 16 days before the Final Report Hearing date.
Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of this ruling to Defendant.
5 30-2023-01351823 Plaintiff Vannessa Zendejas’ (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Approval Zendejas vs. Incredible of Settlement Under Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) Entertainment, Inc. is GRANTED.
The court concludes that the $150,000.00 PAGA settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable, and approves the following specific awards: • $50,000.00 to plaintiff’s counsel [50% to Lawyers for Justice, PC and 50% to Parker & Minne, LLP] for plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees, as requested;
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.