Truong vs. Batalla

27

12 Truong vs. Batalla

2023-01300672 Motion for Terminating Sanctions Defendant’s motion was served on Plaintiff via email on 1/29/26. However, Plaintiff’s counsel withdrew from this matter effective 9/18/24 and Plaintiff apparently remains unrepresented by counsel in this case. Therefore, Defendant is required to serve the motion on Plaintiff via non-electronic means, such as mail or personal service. California Rules of Court, Rule 2.251(c)(3)(B) provides that selfrepresented parties “are to be served by non-electronic methods unless they affirmatively consent to electronic service.” Similarly, Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6 subdivisions (b)(1) and (f)(2) provide that unrepresented persons are exempt from mandatory electronic filing and service. Here, there is no indication Plaintiff has affirmatively consented to electronic service. Therefore, unless Defendant obtains Plaintiff’s consent to electronic service, Defendant must serve the motion on Plaintiff by non-electronic means within the statutory notice period before the new hearing date. Tentative Ruling: Defendant Luis Batalla’s Motion for Terminating Sanctions is CONTINUED to 6/22/26 at 1:45 p.m. in this Department. 13 Alliance Funding Group vs. ELT Transportation LLC

2024-01411660 Claim of Exemption - Wage Garnishment Before the Court is the continued hearing on a claim of exemption of wages presented by judgment debtor Teona Petrosian (Debtor) and the opposition to claim of exemption filed by judgment creditor Alliance Funding Group (Creditor). The Court finds Debtor timely complied with the requirements to claim an exemption of levied funds, and Creditor timely complied with the requirements to oppose the claim of exemption. (Code of Civ. Proc. §§ 703.520, 703.550.)