Scott vs. Innovative Pain Treatment Solutions, LLC

9 Scott vs. Innovative Motion to Dismiss Stakeholder Pain Treatment (Case Management Conference) Solutions, LLC 1. Motion to Dismiss

The court CONTINUES Plaintiff KYLE SCOTT’s motion to dismiss stakeholder to July 31, 2026, at 9:30 am in Department W08.

Plaintiff filed this interpleader action and now moves for an order: (1) dismissing Plaintiff as stakeholder, (2) awarding $3,174.70 in costs and $8,875.00 in attorney’s fees, and (3) permitting deposit of the remaining interpleaded funds of $14,818.22 for Defendant BAHIYA SIGAFOES and $3,728.80 for Defendant CHERRY ANTOINE with the court.

After filing the motion on 3/23/26, Plaintiff named F & M RADIOLOGY MEDICAL CENTER (“F&M”) as Doe 2 on 4/16/26. A Proof of Service re Summons and Complaint was recently filed as to F&M, showing service of the summons and complaint and CMC notice on 4/22/26. (ROA 131.) As such, F&M’s time to respond has not yet expired. Moreover, the proof of service does not show that F&M was served with the instant motion.

As F&M may claim an interest in the interpleaded funds, the court finds additional notice is required before it will rule on the instant motion.

Plaintiff SHALL immediately serve F & M Radiology Medical Center with the moving papers, if it has not already done so, and give notice of the continued hearing, including to F&M.

Plaintiff shall file proof of service no later than nine (9) court days before the continued hearing date.

Again, Plaintiff to give notice.

8