Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement (CCP 877.6)
24CV063935: MCCALL, et al. vs MITCHELL, et al. 07/28/2026 Hearing on Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement (CCP 877.6) filed by Pacific Rim Property Management (Defendant) + CRS# A-63935-001 in Department 512
Tentative Ruling - 07/23/2026 Elizabeth Riles
The Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement (CCP 877.6) filed by Jack Adamson, Pacific Rim Property Management on 07/01/2026 is Granted.
Defendants Jack Adamsons and Jack Adamson dba Pacific Rim Property Managements (Adamson) unopposed Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement is GRANTED.
This a landlord-tenant dispute in which plaintiff tenants Elaine McCall and Anthony Presley (Plaintiffs) allege claims sounding primarily in breach of the warranty of habitability and retaliation against defendants property owner and property manager.
The claims against Adamson settled for $120,000, which Adamsons counsel declares is 40% of the monetary damages alleged or sought by Plaintiffs in the lawsuit. Adamson contends that the settlement amount is reasonable and in good faith because the property owner, defendants Agnes and Kenneth Mitchell are at least 60% responsible for the untenantable condition of the leasehold property.
The moving papers contain a proof of service indicating timely and effective service on the other parties to this action. There is no record of any Opposition papers filed with the Court or served on Adamson.
Wherefore, Adamsons Motion for Good Faith Settlement Determination is GRANTED. Therefore, pursuant to Section 877, subdivision (b), of the California Code of Civil Procedure, Adamson is hereby discharged from all liability for any contribution to any other parties.
CONTESTING TENTATIVE RULINGS
PLEASE NOTE: If any party contests the tentative ruling, the hearing on the motion will occur remotely via the court's own video-conferencing system.
Pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1308, subdivision (a)(1), this tentative ruling will become the order of the Court unless it is contested before 4:00 PM on the court day preceding the noticed hearing date.
To contest a tentative ruling, a party should do the following:
First, the party must notify Department 512, by email at Dept512@alameda.courts.ca.gov and copy all counsel of record and self-represented parties. The contesting party must state in the subject line of the email the case name, case number and motion. 24CV063935: MCCALL, et al. vs MITCHELL, et al. 07/28/2026 Hearing on Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement (CCP 877.6) filed by Pacific Rim Property Management (Defendant) + CRS# A-63935-001 in Department 512
Second, the party shall log into the eCourt Public Portal, search for this case (e.g., by case number), select the case name, select the "Tentative Rulings" tab, click the "Click to Contest this Ruling" button, enter the party's name and a brief statement of the party's reason for contesting the tentative, and click "Proceed."
Parties may appear via videoconference, using the Zoom.com website or application.
TO CONNECT TO ZOOM:
Join the meeting using the following link: https://www.zoomgov.com/j/16057661931 Join the meeting by Phone:
Meeting ID: 160 5766 1931
1 669 254 5252, 16057661931# US (San Jose) 1 669 216 1590, 16057661931# US (San Jose) 833 568 8864 US Toll-free
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”