Motion for New Trial; Motion for Judgment Not Withstanding the Verdict
Relief cause of action, the motion is GRANTED as to the B&P Violation as well. Court will not rule on the evidentiary objections as they were improperly formatted. “DECLARATION OF NOJAN BOLOORCHI IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS/CROSS- DEFENDANTS’ REPLY” (ROA 94) was not considered. MP to provide notice
110 Truong vs. Tran
21-01237262
1. Motion for New Trial 2. Motion for Judgment Not Withstanding the Verdict (1-2) Denied
111 Hamidian vs. Avis Budget Group, Inc.
20-01174350
Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement x 2 are CONTINUED to 06/09/2026 at 10:00 AM Moving parties to give notice. 112 Global Asset Recovery Management LLC vs. Velopower, Inc.
25-01473312
1. Motion for Leave to File Cross Complaint - Order granting leave to filed XC signed and filed 4/10/26.
2. Case Management Conference is CONTINUED to 06/23/2026 at 09:30 AM Clerk to give notice.
113 EBF Holdings, LLC vs. Kertnz Gallery, Inc.
24-01396558 Motion to Revive Action and Enter Judgment Plaintiff EBF Holdings LLC (“Plaintiff”) moves for an order “(a) reviving this action under the Court’s retained jurisdiction, and (b) entering judgment against Defendants KERTNZ GALLERY, INC. and OTTO BEASLEY (“Defendants”) pursuant to the parties’ executed Stipulation for Entry of Judgment, in the
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”