| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Date |
|---|
Application/Request for order of service by publication and service on Secretary of State
Plaintiff Messner Reeves, LLP’s motion for an order allowing it (1) the summons and complaint for Defendant Jacob Poozhikala via publication; and (2) to serve the summons and complaint for Defendant JP23 Hospitality, Inc. on the Secretary of State is GRANTED. Service via publication
Code Civ. Proc., § 415.50 provides that a “summons may be served by publication if upon affidavit it appears to the satisfaction of the court in which the action is pending that the party to be served cannot with reasonable diligence be served in another manner specified in this article and that either: (1) [a] cause of action exists against the party upon whom service is to be made or he or she is a necessary or proper party to the action, [or]... (2) [t]he party to be served has or claims an interest in real or personal property in this state that is subject to the jurisdiction of the court or the relief demanded in the action consists wholly or in part in excluding the party from any interest in the property.
Plaintiff attempted to personally serve Defendants at address listed on the Secretary of State Website, also believed to be Poozhikala’s personal address on six different occasions without success. (Reimers Decl., ¶ 4, Exs. B, C.)
Additionally, Plaintiff’s counsel learned that Poozhikala was maintaining an action in pro per in Orange County Superior Court, and attempted to serve Defendants at a status conference in that matter, without success because Poozhikala did not appear for the hearing. (Reimers Decl., ¶ 5, Exs. D-F.)
Plaintiff additionally attempted to serve Defendants via mail pursuant to Code Civ. Proc., § 415.30; however, Plaintiff never received the acknowledgments of receipt back. (Reimers Decl., ¶ 6, Exs. G, H.)
Plaintiff’s counsel also performed a public records search which revealed two additional recent addresses for Defendants. (Reimers Decl., ¶ 7.) One of the two addresses was a restaurant; an employee stated he never heard of Defendants. (Id.) Plaintiff attempted service at the other address multiple times without success. (Id., Exs. I, J.)
Based on the foregoing information, the Court finds that Plaintiff acted with reasonable diligence to locate and serve Defendant Jacob Poozhikala. The motion to serve via publication on Defendant in the Orange County Register is therefore granted.
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.
Service via Secretary of State
Corp. Code § 1702(a) states (emphasis added):
If an agent for the purpose of service of process has resigned and has not been replaced or if the agent designated cannot with reasonable diligence be found at the address designated for personally delivering the process, or if no agent has been designated, and it is shown by affidavit to the satisfaction of the court that process against a domestic corporation cannot be served with reasonable diligence upon the designated agent by hand in the manner provided in Section 415.10, subdivision (a) of Section 415.20 or subdivision (a) of Section 415.30 of the Code of Civil Procedure or upon the corporation in the manner provided in subdivision (a), (b) or (c) of Section 416.10 or subdivision (a) of Section 416.20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the court may make an order that the service be made upon the corporation by delivering by hand to the Secretary of State, or to any person employed in the Secretary of State’s office in the capacity of assistant or deputy, one copy of the process for each defendant to be served, together with a copy of the order authorizing such service. Service in this manner is deemed complete on the 10th day after delivery of the process to the Secretary of State.
As set forth above, Plaintiff has not been able to serve Poozhikala, JP23’s agent for service of process. Poozhikala is also the sole officer and director of JP23 according to the Secretary of State information. (Reimers Decl., ¶ 2.)
Like with respect to the above (service on individual), Plaintiff’s counsel’s declaration demonstrates that process cannot be served with reasonable diligence upon the corporation’s designated agent, because he cannot be found. Nor can service be reasonably effectuated by any other allowable means. As a result, the motion to allow Plaintiff to serve Defendant JP23 Hospitality Company, Inc. via the Secretary of State is granted.
Case Management Conference
Continued to 8-17-26 at 9:00 a.m.
Order to Show Cause re: Dismissal
Off calendar.