Motion for Sanctions
SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 12 Honorable Nahal Iravani-Sani, Presiding Courtroom Clerk, Ryan Nguyen 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 882-2230
DATE: 07/29/2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M.
LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING LINES 1-2 24CV444354 Nikka Freeman et al vs MOTION TO STRIKE & DEMURRER Neil Patel et al Please Ctrl click (or scroll down to) Line 1-2 LINES 3-4 24CV445907 Jin Yin vs Hiu Yip et al MOTION: SANCTIONS
Defendant’s motion for sanctions; untimely filed supplemental opposition briefing by Plaintiff; Defendant’s request to strike Plaintiff’s supplemental opposition was considered; courts have a policy favoring disposition of cases on the merits rather than on procedural grounds. The court admonishes Plaintiffs’ counsel to comply with the court rules and procedures with respect to future filings. Defendant’s request for continuance to file and serve substantive reply is GRANTED.
Defendant shall file the supplemental consolidated sanctions submission and supporting billing records by September 18, 2026. No further response by Plaintiff. The Court will thereafter determine the appropriate sanctions, if any, and the amount thereof.
Continued to September 30, 2026 at 9:00 in Department 12.
LINE 5 25CV455853 Silicon Valley MOTION TO STRIKE &/OR TAX COSTS Taxpayers Association, Inc. et al vs Please Ctrl click (or scroll down to) Line 5 City of Campbell et al. LINE 6 25CV459137 Alexander Xue DEMURRER vs EMC Santana Row, LLC Please Ctrl click (or scroll down to) Line 6
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”