Petition for Internal Affairs of a Trust
25PR00462 Case Type Decedent's Estate Hearing Date / Time Tue, 07/28/2026 - 09:00 Nature of Proceedings Petition for Final Distribution Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: Appearances required. The following is noted for the Court at the hearing: Assignment by Tabitha Morgan grossly unreasonable. The proposed distribution does not comply with the intestate distribution scheme in the Probate Code. When a decedent's estate does not pass by a testamentary instrument (by failure of transfer, or omission, etc.), that property passes to the decedent's heirs as prescribed in Division 6, part 2 of the Probate Code (Sec.Sec.6401, et seq.). (Prob.
Code, Sec. 6400.) Tabitha Morgan alleges in supplement that she is assigning 66.6% of her estate to family members for no reason other than charity. This is a gift, not an assignment, and does not justify or warrant the Court to deviate from the intestate scheme in the Probate Code. Ms. Morgan is free to give her inheritance away to anyone she pleases after the Court orders distribution to her in accordance with the law of California. Therefore, the Court should find the assignments grossly unreasonable pursuant to Probate Code section 11604, and order 50% of the estate distributed to Tabitha Morgan so the proposed distribution does not depart from the law of intestacy.
Tentative Ruling: Matter of The Sun Seo Kim and Mijija Kim Tentative Ruling: Matter of The Sun Seo Kim and Mijija Kim Case Number
Case Type Trust Hearing Date / Time Tue, 07/28/2026 - 09:00 Nature of Proceedings Petition for Internal Affairs of a Trust Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: Appearances required. A Petition for Internal Affairs was filed on October 21, 2025. Objection has not been received. An objection will place this matter at issue and require evidentiary hearing to resolve. (In re Estate of Lensch (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 667, 676; Conservatorship of Farrant (2021) 67 Cal.App.5th 370, 377.) Any Respondents desirous to object to the Petition, must file a written objection before the hearing. The court has authority to require all objectors to file a written objection pursuant CRC, Rule 7.801, or else deem the failure to do so a waiver.
Tentative Ruling: Carolina Ayala et al vs Archdiocese of Los Angeles Education and Welfare Corporation et al Tentative Ruling: Carolina Ayala et al vs Archdiocese of Los Angeles Education and Welfare Corporation et al
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”