Motion to Continue Trial
23CV003347: BROWN vs CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, A PUBLIC ENTITY, et al. 07/10/2026 Hearing on Motion to Continue Trial in Department 17A
Tentative Ruling
NOTICE:
*** If oral arguments are requested or appearances are required, the hearing may be conducted in person or remotely via ZoomGov, which includes telephonic and teleconferencing options. No Court Call appearances will be permitted. If you choose to use Zoom you must use your first and last name on your ZoomGov account so the court can positively identify you. The Department 17A ZoomLink is https://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/16173813009 and the ZoomGov ID is: 161 7381 3009. Appearances via videoconference using the above link are preferred. To appear on ZoomGov by phone, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the ZoomGov ID referenced above, available phone commands include *6 to mute/unmute or *9 to raise your hand. If you experience issues joining your hearing, please contact the clerk in Department 17A at (916) 874- 5487 for assistance.
Please take notice that effective April 13, 2026, the Presiding Judge Law & Motion calendar has been moved to Department 17A at the Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye Courthouse, the Honorable Lawrence G. Brown presiding. The new courthouse is located at 500 G Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.
Hon. Lawrence G. Brown Department 17A 916-874-5487 dept17A@saccourt.ca.gov ***
TENTATIVE RULING:
Plaintiff Keionna Browns motion to continue trial is unopposed and GRANTED.
The Court finds good cause for continuance based on the lack of opposition, the continuance of Defendants summary judgment motion to February 25, 2027, and based upon consideration of the factors set forth in California Rules of Court, rule 3.1332.
The July 16, 2026 Mandatory Settlement Conference and August 18, 2026 trial dates are VACATED.
This case is referred to the Trial Setting Process for selection of trial and mandatory settlement
23CV003347: BROWN vs CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, A PUBLIC ENTITY, et al. 07/10/2026 Hearing on Motion to Continue Trial in Department 17A
conference (MSC) dates. All counsel (including parties appearing in pro per) shall confer and agree upon three (3) trial and three (3) MSC dates. Available dates can be obtained on the Courts web site at https://services.saccourt.ca.gov/PublicCourtApplications/Civil/TrialSettingProcess/. Plaintiff shall promptly utilize the online submission form on the above website to submit the parties preferred dates to the Court. The Court will review the submitted dates and from those, select one MSC and one trial date. The Court will provide email confirmation of the confirmed dates to the party that submitted the online form.
If the parties have not agreed on dates and/or otherwise fail to submit their agreed upon dates to the Court on or before the 60th day after the date of the Courts referral order, court staff shall assign MSC and trial dates that are next available, unless an extension of time has been granted by the appropriate Civil Home Court Department.
Upon receiving email confirmation from the Court confirming the calendared MSC and trial dates, Plaintiff shall file and serve notice of such dates, times, and departments to all parties. The Court will provide notice to the parties only in the instance where the Court has selected dates due to the failure of the parties to submit their preferred dates in a timely manner.
All trial related and discovery deadlines shall be governed by the new trial date.
This minute order is effective immediately. No formal order or other notice is required. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1019.5; CRC 3.1312.)
*** This case has been assigned to Department 17A for hearing. In the event that either party requests a hearing the matter will be heard at 9:30 a.m. in Department 17A. Any party requesting an oral argument must contact the clerk at (916) 874-5487 and opposing counsel or parties in pro per by 12:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. If a proper request for hearing is not made, this shall become the order of the Court.
Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private court reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government Code section 68086 and California Rules of Court, rule 2.956. Requirements for requesting a court reporter are listed in the Policy for Official Reporter Pro Tempore available on the Sacramento Superior Court website
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
23CV003347: BROWN vs CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, A PUBLIC ENTITY, et al. 07/10/2026 Hearing on Motion to Continue Trial in Department 17A
at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp-6a.pdf. Parties may contact Court- Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore by utilizing the list of Court Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore available at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp- 13.Pdf A Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) is required to be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to the hearing, if not using a reporter from the Courts Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list, Once the form is signed it must be filed with the clerk.
If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and it must be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will forward the form to the Court Reporters Office and an official reporter will be provided. ***
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”