DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25628326·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

BHSD TPC PROPCO LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY VS. CORE: SF LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ET AL

DEMURRER to CROSS COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jul 27, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 4, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBHSD TPC PROPCO LLC
DefendantCORE: SF LLC
OtherMICHAEL SHVO
OtherSHVO CONCEPTS, LLC
OtherSHVO PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25628326 - July 27, 2026 Hearing date: July 27, 2026 Case number: CGC25628326 Case title: BHSD TPC PROPCO LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY VS. CORE: SF LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25628326 | Case Title: | | BHSD TPC PROPCO LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY VS. CORE: SF LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-27 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to CROSS COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 27, 2026. Line 3.2.

CROSS DEFENDANT BHSD TPC PROPCO LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, MICHAEL SHVO, SHVO CONCEPTS, LLC, SHVO PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC DEMURRER to CROSS COMPLAINT is continued to August 4, 2026 to be heard with other pending motions. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share