DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
34-2022-00314757-CU-DF-GDS·sacramento·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 3 years agoGRANTED with leave to amend

Elite Healthcare Resources LLC vs. Star Nursing Services, Inc.

Motion to Strike

Hearing date
Jun 22, 2023
Department
53
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffElite Healthcare Resources LLC
DefendantStar Nursing Services, Inc.
DefendantNancy Frost
DefendantKimberly Joens
DefendantStar Nursing, Inc.

Ruling

34-2022-00314757-CU-DF-GDS: Elite Healthcare Resources LLC vs. Star Nursing Services, Inc. 06/22/2023 Motion to Strike - Civil Law and Motion in Department 53

Tentative Ruling

NOTICE: Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure: To request limited oral argument, on any matter on this calendar, you must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice mail message: a) identifying themselves as the party requesting oral argument; b) indicating the specific matter/motion for which they are requesting oral argument; and c) confirming that it has notified the opposing party of its intention to appear and that opposing party may appear via Zoom using the Zoom link and Meeting ID indicated below.

If no request for oral argument is made, the tentative ruling becomes the final order of the Court. Unless ordered to appear in person by the Court, parties may appear remotely either telephonically or by video conference via the Zoom video/audio conference platform with notice to the Court and all other parties in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure 367.75. Although remote participation is not required, the Court will presume all parties are appearing remotely for non-evidentiary civil hearings.

The Department 53/54 Zoom Link is https://saccourt-cagov.zoomgov.com/my/sscdept53.54 and the Zoom Meeting ID is 161 4650 6749. To appear on Zoom telephonically, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the Zoom Meeting ID referenced above. NO COURTCALL APPEARANCES WILL BE ACCEPTED. Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private court reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government code §68086 and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956. Requirements for requesting a court reporter are listed in the Policy for Official Reporter Pro Tempore available on the Sacramento Superior Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp-6a.pdf.

Parties may contact Court- Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore by utilizing the list of Court Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore available at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp- 13.Pdf A Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) is required to be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to the hearing, if not using a reporter from the Court’s Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list. Once the form is signed it must be filed with the clerk.

If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and it must be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will be forward the form to the Court Reporter’s Office and an official reporter will be provided.

34-2022-00314757-CU-DF-GDS: Elite Healthcare Resources LLC vs. Star Nursing Services, Inc. 06/22/2023 Motion to Strike - Civil Law and Motion in Department 53

TENTATIVE RULING: Defendants Star Nursing Services, Inc., Nancy Frost, Kimberly Joens, and Star Nursing, Inc.’s motion to strike portions of Elite Healthcare Resources, LLC’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) is granted with leave to amend.

Defendants move to strike allegations in the FAC referring to Star Nursing Services, Inc., punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees and costs. Apparently, Plaintiff’s counsel confirmed in meet and confer correspondence that Plaintiff would not opposed the motion, and Plaintiff did not do so.

The motion to strike is granted for the reasons stated in Defendant’ memorandum of points and authorities. The Court construes Plaintiff’s failure to oppose the motion as a concession on the merits. (D.I. Chadbourne, Inc. v. Superior Court (1964) 60 Cal.2d 723, 728, fn. 4 [where nonmoving party fails to oppose a ground for a motion “it is assumed that [nonmoving party] concedes” that ground].)

However, given that the Court granted leave to amend in connection with Defendants’ demurrer to the FAC, Plaintiff is also given leave to amend the allegations which have been stricken.

Plaintiff may file and serve an amended complaint no later than July 3, 2023. Defendants shall file and serve their response within 30 days thereafter, 35 days if the amended complaint is served by mail as modified by the CCP 430.41 extension if necessary.

The minute order is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to CRC Rule 3.1312 or further notice is required.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share