DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
16PR-0352·slo·Civil·Trust Administration
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

In re: Jerry McKibben and Karen Tallent Trust

Motion to Correct Clerical Error in Judgment

Hearing date
Jul 22, 2026
Department
D4
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 21, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherJerry McKibben and Karen Tallent Trust
PetitionerPetitioner
RespondentRespondent

Ruling

In re: Jerry McKibben and Karen Tallent Trust, 16PR-0352

Hearing: Motion to Correct Clerical Error in Judgment

Date: July 22, 2026

Notice of Petitioner’s Motion to Correct Clerical Error in Judgment (Motion) is deficient. On March 30, 2026, Petitioner electronically served Respondent and other parties with Notice of Hearing of the Motion. (Proof of Service filed 3/30/2026.) Respondent is self-represented. Electronic service on a self-represented litigant is prohibited under California Rules of Court, rule 2.251(c)(3)(B), unless the self-represented party has “affirmatively consent[ed] to electronic service.”

The Court notes that Respondent may serve parties who are represented by legal counsel electronically and does not consent to electronic service by doing so. At a June 10, 2026, hearing in this case Respondent confirmed that she has not consented to receiving electronic service.

The motion will be continued accordingly.

ORDER

The motion is continued to October 21, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in D4.

Petitioner’s counsel should review notice for any future motions to ensure notice has been properly provided.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share