Perez vs. Service Champions, LLC

• In the second row, second column in the table under Section 9 of the class notice, the year stated should be 2026 not 2023. • Participating class members can object to the amount allocated to the PAGA settlement. The first column at the top of page 6 of the class notice, should be amended to state: “Participating Class Members Can Object to the Class Settlement,” with the phrase “but not the PAGA Settlement” deleted.

Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of this ruling to the LWDA and Defendant.

7 30- Plaintiffs Francisco Perez, Oscar Zaragoza and Niyom Chetcheuth’s 2024- (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action 013968 and PAGA Settlement is GRANTED. 61 Perez vs. A Final Approval Hearing is set for December 21, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. All papers Service in support of the Final Approval Hearing, including detailed hourly Champi breakdowns of plaintiff’s attorneys to support a lodestar cross-check, detailed ons, LLC plaintiff attorney cost breakdowns, an Administrator declaration and invoice, and plaintiffs’ declarations to support the enhancement request, must be filed at least 16 calendar days before the Final Approval Hearing date to provide enough time for court review, and must be served in compliance with CCP notice of motion requirements.

Plaintiff shall provide notice of this ruling to the LWDA and Defendant.

8 30- Off Calendar 2022- 012405 91 Boucher vs. Unstopp able Automot ive Group, LLC 1 30- MSJ BY DEFENDANT COUNTY OF ORANGE 1 2020- 011740 Defendant County of Orange’s (“County”) Motion for Summary Judgment is 05 DENIED. The County’s alternative Motion for Summary Adjudication is Utzman vs. GRANTED as to Issue No. 1 as to the First, Second and Eighth Causes of County Action based on Plaintiffs’ failure to satisfy the pre-filing requirements under of the Government Tort Claims Act for these claims that seek only money Orange damages for past misconduct. The Court DENIES summary adjudication as to Issue Nos. 2 and 3.