DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
304·orange·Civil·Professional Negligence
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

Jinx vs. Family Orthodontics & Oral Surgery

Motion to Vacate or Continue the Trial Date

Hearing date
Jul 27, 2026
Department
C24
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJinx
DefendantDean Azzeh, D.D.S.
DefendantDean Azzeh D.D.S., Inc. dba Family Orthodontics & Oral Surgery

Ruling

The court continues the 7/27/26 CMC to 9/8/26 at 8:45am in Dept. C24.

Post shall give notice.

304 Jinx vs. Family The Motion to Vacate or Continue the Trial Date, Orthodontics & filed on 5/11/26 by Defendants Dean Azzeh, D.D.S. Oral Surgery and Dean Azzeh D.D.S., Inc. dba Family Orthodontics & Oral Surgery (Defendants), is GRANTED as to the request for a continuance.

The Motion shows good cause for a trial continuance, as Defendants have presented evidence demonstrating that their discovery efforts have been substantially impeded by the conduct of Plaintiff here. (Foxwell Decl., ¶¶ 7-21.) Plaintiff disputes that characterization but does not object to the proposed continuance. Under these circumstances, the requested continuance is warranted. The Court therefore continues the 1/19/27 trial date to 8/30/27 at 9:30am, with all related deadlines to be continued accordingly.

Defendants shall give notice.

305 Baptiste vs. The court withholds a tentative ruling. County of Orange 306 Osorio vs. The Motion to be Relieved as Counsel, filed on Bautista 4/7/26 by Attorney Derek Herrera of Avrek Law Firm, as to the representation of Plaintiff Ignacio Artemio Hernandez Osorio, is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED.

The Motion is primarily in order and unopposed. However, the proposed order needs revisions [check boxes 3(b), 5(a), and 9(a), and fill in for Boxes 6 and 7].

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share