DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25PB-0033166·shasta·Probate·Estate
Hearing about 1 month agoCONTINUED

ESTATE OF JANIS WALKER DEMERS

Confirmation of filing the Inventory and Appraisal

Hearing date
Jul 27, 2026
Department
44
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 21, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$10,000.00$250.00

Attorneys

Susan Jeffersfor Other

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25PB-0033166 This matter is on calendar for confirmation of filing the Inventory and Appraisal. The Partial Inventory and Appraisal filed on July 7, 2026, is accepted by the Court despite that item 4 incorrectly states that no probate referee is required by order of the court dated March 20, 2026. There is no order dated March 20, 2026, and the Court’s order dated March 30, 2026, specifically appointed Susan Jeffers as probate referee. Considering a probate referee was used, the defect may be overlooked.

The bond is insufficient by $10,000.00. The Personal Representatives, or Counsel are ORDERED to file an ex parte application to increase the bond, as required under California Rule of Court 7.501(b). The matter is continued to Monday, September 21, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for status of bond and confirmation of filing the Final Inventory and Appraisal. If a Final Inventory and Appraisal cannot be filed prior to the continued hearing, the Court ORDERS a Status Report be filed and served no later than five court days before the next hearing date to advise what must be accomplished before the Final Inventory and Appraisal can be filed.

Failure to file either the Final Inventory and Appraisal or the Status Report may result in the issuance of an Order to Show Cause Re: Monetary Sanctions of $250.00 for failure to timely file the Final Inventory and Appraisal and failure to comply with the Court’s order. The Court notes the future date of March 29, 2027, for Status of Administration. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share