DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25PB-0033074·shasta·Probate·Estate
Hearing about 1 month agoCONTINUED

ESTATE OF CHASTITY MILENEWICZ

Petition for Probate of Will; Competing Petition for Probate of Will

Hearing date
Jul 27, 2026
Department
44
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 31, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherJesse Penta
PetitionerMelissa Folsom

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25PB-0033074 This matter is on calendar for further proceedings on a Petition for Probate of Will filed by the Public Administrator. This matter is being heard concurrently with case 33358. Letters of Special Administration issued on September 29, 2025, appointing the Public Administrator as Special Administrator. The Court previously determined that proof of publication has been filed. The will purports to distribute the estate to the trustee of the Milenewicz-Penta Revocable Living Trust; however, a successor Trustee has still not been appointed and provided notice of the proceedings. Jesse Penta previously filed an objection.

This matter is also on calendar for further proceedings on a competing Petition for Probate of Will filed by Melissa Folsom. Proof of proper publication has been filed. For the same reason as stated above, proper notice has not been provided. Proof of proper publication has been filed. No Duties and Liabilities of Personal Representative (DE-147) has been filed. Jesse Penta has filed an objection.

The matter is continued to Monday, August 31, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for further proceedings on both Petitions. Ms. Folsom is required to file form DE-147 prior to the continued hearing date. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

ESTATE OF LUIS MIRAMONTES

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share