DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24PB-0032486·shasta·Probate·Estate
Hearing about 1 month agoCONTINUED

ESTATE OF MARC BASSLE

Confirmation of filing Inventory and Appraisal; Status of Administration

Hearing date
Jul 27, 2026
Department
44
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 26, 2027
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$250.00

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 24PB-0032486 This matter is on calendar for confirmation of filing the Inventory and Appraisal and Status of Administration. A Final Inventory and Appraisal has not been filed. A Status Report has been filed which indicates additional time is needed before the Final Inventory and Appraisal can be filed. No Petition for Final Distribution has been filed. A properly noticed Status Report has been filed indicating that additional time is needed before the estate administration can be finalized.

The matter is continued to Monday, July 26, 2027, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for Status of Administration. If a Petition for Final Distribution cannot be filed prior to the next hearing, the Court ORDERS the Personal Representative to timely file and serve a Status Report with proper Notice of Hearing in compliance with Probate Code Section 12200 et seq. Failure to do so may result in the issuance of an Order to Show Cause Re: Monetary Sanctions of $250.00 for failure

to timely close the estate administration and failure to comply with the Court’s order. If a properly noticed Status Report or Petition for Final Distribution is noticed for a different date, the Court will vacate the July 26, 2027, date. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

ESTATE OF LEIF CHRISTENSEN

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share