Status of Administration
July 27, 2026 Dept. 9 Probate Tentative Rulings
13. 21PR0038 ESTATE OF DAN'L G. ROEDIGER STATUS OF ADMINISTRATION
On July 28, 2025, the Court set a Review Hearing – Status of Administration for July 27, 2026. The Court ordered the Personal Representative or their counsel to appear at the Status of Administration Hearing or file a Status Report with the Court at least two weeks in advance of the hearing.
On July 17, 2026, Petitioner, Teri C. Petersen (“Petitioner”) filed a Status Report. Petitioner informed the Court that since the last status hearing, additional work has been completed toward preparation of the First and Final Account and Report of Administration. During the review of the estate’s financial records, it was determined that additional estate assets may need to be included in a Supplemental Inventory and Appraisal. Additional information and financial records are being obtained to prepare the Supplemental Inventory and Appraisal, as well as the First and Final Account and Report of Administration for submission to the Probate Referee.
As the completion of the First and Final Account and Report of Administration is dependent upon completion of the Supplemental Inventory and Appraisal, receipt of the Probate Referee’s valuation of the additional assets, and completion of the review of the estate’s financial records, Petitioner requests the Status Hearing be continued for approximately 90 to 120 days to allow sufficient time to complete the Supplemental Inventory and Appraisal process, obtain the Probate Referee’s valuation, complete the review of the estate’s financial records, and prepare and file the First and Final Account and Report of Administration together with the Petition for Final Distribution.
TENTATIVE RULING #13: PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR A CONTINUANCE IS GRANTED. THE HEARING IS CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 9, 2026, AT 8:30 A.M. IN DEPARTMENT NINE.
21
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”