DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
30-2025-01484900-CU-BC-CJC·orange·Civil·Breach of Contract
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED

Providence Capital Funding, Inc. vs. Lozamira Inc.

Motion to Stay Enforcement of Abstract of Judgment

Hearing date
Jul 24, 2026
Department
C31
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffProvidence Capital Funding, Inc.
DefendantLozamira Inc.
DefendantRosa Lozano
DefendantMA. E. Miramontes Gamboa
DefendantGerardo Lozano, Jr.

Ruling

There is no prejudice, as trial has not yet been scheduled.

Cross-complainants are ORDERED to file the FAXC within 5 days.

Clerk to give notice.

3 Hauzer vs. Motion to Deem Facts Admitted Progressive Direct Insurance Off calendar. Reclassified to limited civil. Company 30-2025- 01487777-CU- BC-CJC 4 Providence Motion to Stay Enforcement of Abstract of Capital Funding, Judgment Inc. vs. Lozamira Inc. Defendants’ Motion to Stay Enforcement of Abstract of 30-2025- Judgment is DENIED. 01484900-CU- BC-CJC Defendants Rosa Lozano, MA. E. Miramontes Gamboa, and Gerardo Lozano, Jr. are currently defaulted and cannot take affirmative action in the case until default is set aside. (See Devlin v. Kearny Mesa AMC/Jeep/Renault, Inc. (1984) 155 Cal.App.3d 381, 385.)

Clerk to give notice.

5 Lugo vs. Cityside Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Networks, LLC Settlement 30-2025- Off calendar. Transferred to complex civil. 01496289-CU- OE-CJC 6 State Bar of Motion to Terminate Jurisdiction California vs. Petitioner State Bar of California’s unopposed Motion to Bosse Terminate the Court’s Jurisdiction over Gregory Bosse’s 30-2023- Law Practice is GRANTED. (See Bus. & Prof. Code, § 01339321-CU- 6190.6.) PT-CJC The State Bar is authorized to destroy any remaining client files and property in its possession that are not original wills or trust documents.

The case is dismissed.

Clerk to give notice.

7 Blumberg vs. Motion to Tax Costs or for Revising Calculation of Stroma Medical Post-Judgment Interest Corporation Continued at parties’ request.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share