Motion to Tax Costs or for Revising Calculation of Post-Judgment Interest
There is no prejudice, as trial has not yet been scheduled.
Cross-complainants are ORDERED to file the FAXC within 5 days.
Clerk to give notice.
3 Hauzer vs. Motion to Deem Facts Admitted Progressive Direct Insurance Off calendar. Reclassified to limited civil. Company 30-2025- 01487777-CU- BC-CJC 4 Providence Motion to Stay Enforcement of Abstract of Capital Funding, Judgment Inc. vs. Lozamira Inc. Defendants’ Motion to Stay Enforcement of Abstract of 30-2025- Judgment is DENIED. 01484900-CU- BC-CJC Defendants Rosa Lozano, MA. E. Miramontes Gamboa, and Gerardo Lozano, Jr. are currently defaulted and cannot take affirmative action in the case until default is set aside. (See Devlin v. Kearny Mesa AMC/Jeep/Renault, Inc. (1984) 155 Cal.App.3d 381, 385.)
Clerk to give notice.
5 Lugo vs. Cityside Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Networks, LLC Settlement 30-2025- Off calendar. Transferred to complex civil. 01496289-CU- OE-CJC 6 State Bar of Motion to Terminate Jurisdiction California vs. Petitioner State Bar of California’s unopposed Motion to Bosse Terminate the Court’s Jurisdiction over Gregory Bosse’s 30-2023- Law Practice is GRANTED. (See Bus. & Prof. Code, § 01339321-CU- 6190.6.) PT-CJC The State Bar is authorized to destroy any remaining client files and property in its possession that are not original wills or trust documents.
The case is dismissed.
Clerk to give notice.
7 Blumberg vs. Motion to Tax Costs or for Revising Calculation of Stroma Medical Post-Judgment Interest Corporation Continued at parties’ request.
30-2020- 01172565-CU- BC-CJC 8 Jonjic vs. Motion for Attorney Fees Volkswagen Group of Off calendar. Case dismissed. America, Inc. 30-2025- 01502337-CU- BC-CJC 9 Nguyen vs. JJD Motion to Fix Attorney Fees Development Defendants J.J.D. Development, LLC; Andrew Chu; and LLC Sunny Realty & Management, Inc.’s Motion for Attorney 30-2023- Fees is GRANTED in the reduced amount of $50,462.50. 01321270-CU- BC-CJC Defendants were the prevailing parties. (ROA 139.)
Defendants are entitled to attorney fees pursuant to the lease which provides for fees in any “action or proceeding involving the Premises whether founded in tort, contract or equity ....” (Rothman Decl., Ex. A, § 31.) The clause is broad and, thus, applies to noncontract claims as well. (See
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
After careful consideration of all papers and its own files and knowledge of fees in the community, the Court finds the hourly rate of $550 per hour to be within the reasonable range.
The Court reduces the claimed fees by 8.5 hours for work related to the writ which is not part of this proceeding. Defendants’ citation to Rey v. Madera Unified School Dist. (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 1223, 1243, does not support their contention they may recover fees for separate proceedings. After review of the billing records attached, the Court finds all other entries to be reasonably incurred and not excessive. Plaintiff’s generalized requests for reductions are denied. Therefore, the Court, in its discretion, finds $50,462.50 for 91.75 hours to be reasonable.
Clerk to give notice.
10 Moran vs. Motion for Attorney Fees General Motors, Continued to 8/7/2026. LLC 30-2024- 01396983-CU- BC-CJC