DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
34-2021-00308769-CU-BC-GDS·sacramento·Civil·Breach of Contract
Hearing about 2 months agoOSC re Dismissal set for October 2, 2026; future hearings vacated

Smartrise Engineering, Inc. vs. Brent Meline

Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal

Hearing date
Jul 24, 2026
Department
8A
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 2, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSmartrise Engineering, Inc.
DefendantBrent Meline

Ruling

34-2021-00308769-CU-BC-GDS: Smartrise Engineering, Inc. vs. Brent Meline 07/24/2026 Case Management Conference in Department 8A

Tentative Ruling

NO APPEARANCE REQUIRED

An OSC re Dismissal is set for October 2, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. All future hearings are vacated.

To request oral argument on this matter, you must call Department 8A at (916) 874- 5754 by 4:00 p.m., the court day before this hearing and notification of oral argument must be made to the opposing party/counsel. If no call is made, the tentative ruling becomes the order of the court. (Local Rule 1.06.)

If oral argument is requested, the parties may appear by Zoom with the links below:

To join by Zoom link – https://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/16108301121 To join by phone dial (833) 568-8864 / ID: 16108301121

Counsel for Plaintiff is directed to notice all parties of this order.

Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal is scheduled for 10/02/2026 at 10:30 AM in Department 8A at Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye Courthouse.

On the Court's own motion, the Jury Trial (pretrial conference) scheduled for 07/31/2026 is vacated.

On the Court's own motion, the Jury Trial scheduled for 08/03/2026 is vacated.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share