MOTION FOR ORDER DEEMING THE TRUTH OF THE MATTERS AS ADMITTED
July 24, 2026 Dept. 9 Civil Tentative Rulings
7. 25CV3010 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS. ROSEMARY L NAKAMIYO, AN INDIVIDUAL MOTION FOR ORDER DEEMING THE TRUTH OF THE MATTERS AS ADMITTED
On June 8, 2026, Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Plaintiff”), filed a Notice of Motion and Motion for an Order Deeming the Truth of the Matters Specified in Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions as Admitted; Declaration of Edgar B. Lopez, Esq.; Notice of Lodging of Proposed Order; Proposed Order (the “Motion”).
On July 16, 2026, the Court entered an Order to dismiss the action pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement filed on July 14, 2026. As such, Plaintiff’s Motion is rendered moot.
TENTATIVE RULING #7: PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER DEEMING THE TRUTH OF THE MATTERS SPECIFIED IN PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS AS ADMITTED IS RENDERED MOOT.
NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY TELEPHONE TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6551 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999).
NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; EL DORADO COUNTY LOCAL RULE 8.05.07. PROOF OF SERVICE OF SAID NOTICE MUST BE FILED PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING.
LONG CAUSE HEARINGS MUST BE REQUESTED BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED AND THE PARTIES ARE TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH THREE MUTUALLY AGREEABLE DATES ON FRIDAY AFTERNOONS AT 2:30 P.M. LONG CAUSE ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTS WILL BE SET FOR HEARING ON ONE OF THE THREE MUTUALLY AGREEABLE DATES ON FRIDAY AFTERNOONS AT 2:30 P.M. THE COURT WILL ADVISE THE PARTIES OF THE LONG CAUSE HEARING DATE AND TIME BY 5:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. PARTIES MAY PERSONALLY APPEAR AT THE HEARING.
18
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”