DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV003321·monterey·Civil·Professional Liability
Hearing 2 months agoGRANTED

Maribel Alvarado v. Suman Ramakumar, D.D.S., Inc., et al.

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel

Hearing date
Jun 26, 2026
Department
14
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Jul 7, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMaribel Alvarado
DefendantSuman Ramakumar, D.D.S., Inc.

Attorneys

April S. Glatt(Chauvel & Glatt, LLP)for Defendant
Natalia Canas(Chauvel & Glatt, LLP)for Defendant

Ruling

Maribel Alvarado v. Suman Ramakumar, D.D.S., Inc., et al.

(Consolidated With 24CV004198)

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel

Hearing Date: June 26, 2026

Good cause appearing, the unopposed motion of Attorneys April S. Glatt and Natalia Canas of Chauvel & Glatt, LLP to be relieved as counsel for Defendant Suman Ramakumar, D.D.S., Inc. is GRANTED.

The dismissal hearing scheduled for July 7, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 14, is MAINTAINED.

The Court shall complete the Proposed Order accompanying the motion.

NOTE RE TENTATIVE RULING

This tentative ruling becomes the court’s order, and no hearing shall be held unless one of the parties contests it by following Rule 3.1308 of the California Rules of Court and Monterey County Local Rule 7.9. Those parties wishing to present an oral argument must notify all other parties and the Court no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing; otherwise, NO ORAL ARGUMENT WILL BE PERMITTED, AND THE TENTATIVE RULING WILL BECOME THE ORDER OF THE COURT AND THE HEARING VACATED. You must notify the court by email or by calling the Calendar Department at 831-647-5800, extension 3040, before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share