DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
21CV002228·monterey·Civil·Employment Settlement
Hearing 2 months agoGRANTED

Maria Gonzalez v. BestNest Management, LLC, et al.

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel for BestNest Management, LLC

Hearing date
Jun 26, 2026
Department
14
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Jul 31, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMaria Gonzalez
DefendantBestNest Management, LLC

Attorneys

Matthew Soleimanpour(Soleiman APC)for Defendant
Bradley Beherns(Soleiman APC)for Defendant

Ruling

TENTATIVE RULINGS Maria Gonzalez v. BestNest Management, LLC, et al.

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel for BestNest Management, LLC

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel for BestNest Staffing, LLC

Hearing Date: June 26, 2026

NOTE RE TENTATIVE RULINGS

Each of these tentative rulings becomes the court’s order, and no hearing shall be held unless one of the parties contests it by following Rule 3.1308 of the California Rules of Court and Monterey County Local Rule 7.9. Those parties wishing to present an oral argument must notify all other parties and the Court no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing; otherwise, NO ORAL ARGUMENT WILL BE PERMITTED, AND EACH TENTATIVE RULING WILL BECOME THE ORDER OF THE COURT AND THE RELATED HEARING VACATED. You must notify the court by email or by calling the Calendar Department at 831-647-5800, extension 3040, before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing.

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel for BestNest Management, LLC

Good cause appearing, the unopposed motion of Attorneys Matthew Soleimanpour and Bradley Beherns of Soleiman APC to be relieved as counsel for Defendant BestNest Management, LLC is GRANTED.

The hearing on the Final Approval of the Settlement scheduled for July 31, 2026, at 8:30 a.m., in Department 14, is MAINTAINED.

The Court shall complete the Proposed Order accompanying the motion.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share